|

Moultrie
Digital
Game
Spy 100
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Click here to
view a simple camera mount project you can do yourself! |
2/25/06 -
Read This Statement to Moultrie before
Continuing!
This camera is one of the cheapest yet performs very well. The camera uses a
6 volt lantern battery which will last a couple of months on standard resolution
(10 to 20 pics per week) and with a rechargeable lead acid
battery and available solar panel (aimed at the morning sun) should go all year.
Battery life will decrease with the high resolution setting and when the
majority of the pictures are at night using the flash. The camera is easy
to program and set up. The trigger time is about 3 seconds and the flash
is marginal. Again this camera should be aimed up or down the trail for a
longer sensing time. This camera really shines with its daytime pictures.
The camera's manual is written with the thought that the user has a
general knowledge of how digital cameras and such work. Even though this camera
is straight forward in its programming methods, some might like a better outline
to follow to complete the time date and ID functions. A small instruction
sticker on the inside of the door might aid folks in the field without their
manual.
10-05-05 update:
We spent about 30 minutes on the phone with
the tech folks at Moultrie this morning and
we discussed the system operating versions of the cameras. The Game spy and
Game watcher 100 cameras have had three different versions. The 2.32 v is
the oldest and this was followed by the 1.2 and now the 1.5 versions. The
newer cameras do not have the solar panel terminals on the outside of the
case. They recommend that you use the rechargeable batteries and just hook
the solar panel alligator clips to the battery springs and close the door.
There is no software upgrade available by the factory for the older software
versions. The customer service number is 1-800-653-3334 8 to 5 CST M thru F.
12-7-05 update:
We had one of our
Moultrie 1.3 cams that we
had nicknamed the “the Moultrie Extreme”. The reason for this was that
it had a tendency to be over sensitive and take pictures untill filling
the SD card and run down the battery. Even though it would do this on
occasion, it would still sense and take pictures of animals. On 1
December 05 I wrote
a letter explaining the fault
and returned this camera along with the letter for repair. Today is 7
December and UPS just brought me a box containing a new camera. It
is not a replacement Spy100 it is a new 3.1
Game spy 200. This proves that this is an
exceptional company and they have not only an excellent customer service
they have a very good repair and return service. Another reason for
keeping this camera company's products on top of our recommended picks.
03-20-2006
Update on Moultrie GS-100 and GS-200:
The
following is a list of things that we have learned by way of E
mails, Outdoor Forums, Phone conversations, word of mouth and from
our personal experience. I will say that the cameras that we
purchased and tested seemed to perform very good until
recently, we have had one of the GS-200s
to show some signs of problems. (SD card lock and White out)
-
Poor sensing.
-
SD card locked indication on LCD
but camera functions normally.
-
Bad battery life.
-
Severe difference in trigger time
from day pictures to flash pictures.
-
Whiteout pictures randomly.
-
Moon phase quits being displayed
on pictures.
-
Flash pictures have saucer eyes.
-
Limited sensing range. (sometimes
corrected by the “fix.” (sensor lens
replacement)
-
Camera just dies and will not boot
up with fresh battery.
Most of these problems were discussed
with a Moultrie management person and we were promised an answer by
E mail last week. As of yet we have not received any word. Bill
| Trigger time is 3
to 4 seconds |
  |
|
Flash Tests |
  |
|
Sample Photos |
   |
|
|
|
Movie Sample (windows media format) |

Note: These sample pics
are unmodified. They are original size and may take a while to download on
a slower connection speed.
|
|

Moultrie
Digital
Game
Spy 200
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Click here to
view a simple camera mount project you can do yourself!
Another Simple Mounting Bracket Idea:
    |
2/25/06 -
Read This Statement to Moultrie before Continuing!
Model MFH-DGS-200
Game Spy 200
This is
Moultrie's latest
camera rated at 3.1 MP on its highest setting. The three settings for
resolution are 640X480, 1204X768, and 2048X1536
enhanced. The AVI movie setting is 320X240 at 10 seconds. Out of the box,
the first thing that struck me is that the manual was just one sheet folded
up. This took me back to my first encounter with the Leaf River. First
impressions are often wrong because the programming is very straight forward
and easy so the instructions were more than adequate. Having just over a 2
second trigger time at 80+ degrees says that this cam should perform very
well in the field when the temps are 50 and below. No external solar panel
terminals was one of the few things that appear
to be a negative. The factory folks say just hook the solar panel clips to
the battery springs and close the door. (I personally am going to file a
small notch for the wires to exit) I tried the factory method and the case
crimped the wires so I would be sure to take care and see that the panel
wires exit the case at the bottom and are not crossed to prevent the
possibility a short and of moisture getting inside the case. There is a
little different switch/button arrangement between the 100 series and the
200 series with a big dummy button above the mode button that I seemed to
want to push to change modes. We are looking forward to testing this cam and
it should be chasin game this weekend (November
12, 2005).
03-20-2006
Update on Moultrie GS-100 and GS-200:
The
following is a list of things that we have learned by way of E mails,
Outdoor Forums, Phone conversations, word of mouth and from our personal
experience. I will say that the cameras that we purchased and tested seemed
to perform very good until recently, we have had
one of the GS-200s to show some signs of problems. (SD card lock and White
out)
-
Poor sensing.
-
SD card locked indication on LCD but
camera functions normally.
-
Bad battery life.
-
Severe difference in trigger time from day
pictures to flash pictures.
-
Whiteout pictures randomly.
-
Moon phase quits being displayed on
pictures.
-
Flash pictures have saucer eyes.
-
Limited sensing range. (sometimes
corrected by the “fix.” (sensor lens
replacement)
-
Camera just dies and will not boot up with
fresh battery.
Most of these problems were discussed with a
Moultrie management person and we were promised an answer by E mail last
week. As of yet we have not received any word. Bill
|

(sold by WalMart, dubbed the
Wally World 100)
Moultrie
Digital
Game
Watcher 100
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
WW 100 (Wally
World) Moultrie Game Watcher 2.1 MP
Out of the box this cam resembles all previous Wally
World models. A plain black box and no solar panel
terminals. When you open the case the only difference in appearance is
the LCD screen which has printed indicators for different functions like battery
condition and amount of pictures taken. Programming this camera was somewhat
different than its predecessor but easy and the manual is easy to follow.
***The “Sure Shot” function that
Moultrie has incorporated into this camera is a pain in the foot. It takes two
motions to set it off. The first motion does nothing but if the cam senses a
second motion the picture will be taken in under one second.
Put on a feeder or mineral lick this camera will do a fine
job. If positioned across a trail it would probably miss the first deer but
catch the second animal within one second. This being the case aiming this
camera up and down the trail would be mandatory. Flash range is good to 40 feet
and the same as all other Moultrie's tested. Cost on
this camera with tax was $106. The camera comes with the normal cables and a
couple of small bungee cords. No means of security for this cam was in the box
also. I am working on a new design for securing all of the Moultrie models and
should have pictures posted soon. This camera will be placed on a feeder this
afternoon and will have an old standard black DGS-100 Moultrie V 2.3 with it for
a side by side evaluation.
08-06-06 Update: We had four cameras looking
at the same feeder. There were two IR cameras and two Moultrie 100 cameras. The
two IR cams took 150 pictures each and neither Moultrie took pictures. Thinking
that we may have done something wrong, we re-programmed the Moultries and put
them back out. One of the troubling things we found with the Moultrie (Wally
World 100) was the LCD display. The new display has the numbers letters in a
very fine script that is super hard to read unless the light is exactly right.
This time we were sure that the “ready” indicator was on before we set the cam
out. Trying to program this cam under a tree in the early morning would not
work out very well unless you had a third hand to hold a small flashlight.
We will have results to post in a couple days. This cam is definitely on its
way back to Wally World for a refund.
The over
night test proved that we must have had a little bit of dumb azz when we did
the first set up. 57 pictures and no white outs yet there was evidence of
the flash going off in the early afternoon. The pictures were sharp and
clear for the MP rating. We might hang on to this cam for another week just
to make sure that what we previously experienced was us and not the camera.
The test goes on.
Part
2 of this dumb azz review will find both Anthony and myself going back
to basic camera review school. The other DGS 100 that we were running
parallel with this cam failed to take pictures also. Closer review of
that cam found that we had chosen a very anemic battery which lasted
long enough to turn the camera on, but not long enough to take any
pictures. Everything has been put back to square one and the field tests
re started. Of the group of pictures that were taken last night the
flash seemed to do a very good job and reaching far out past the feeder
illuminating small deer that was 40+feet away.
We have completed the review of this cam and our last
(part 2) findings are that this camera has very acceptable pictures. The
sensing ability seems to be on par with out Moultrie GS-200 "NV". The
battery life seems to be somewhat of an issue. Our fully charged 6 volt
lasted two days and we had less than 40 pictures. This camera will be a
very good candidate for the old hook up the solar panel and run the
wires out the bottom and close the door as we had to do with the early
models of the GS 200. We are waiting for our rep to bring us one of the
new Game Spy 2.1s to see if we get similar results.
|

Moultrie
Black Moultrie GS-100
Model MFH-DGS-100V2
(Late 2006)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
Plain Jane Black Moultrie GS-100 review (late 06) Basically the same camera as the Wally World camera tested earlier. I was curious just what was better about the Game Spy over the Game watcher. This model also does not have the solar terminals and programs the same as the Wally World GW-100. Triggering on this camera is different on this camera. When left dormant for a while with out activity the camera will go to sleep and it takes a 3 second window to wake it up but once awake will trigger within one half second, and after the delay will trigger again under a second if motion is still present. Every time I pick up one of these Moultrie cameras I have a habit of inspecting the seal to see if there is any defects. The reason for this is we had one of our forum members who had a Moultrie in a creek bottom and a flood came and the camera was under water for several days. The camera had no ill effects other than being covered with mud. Try that trick with any of the 06 Cuddebacks and see what happens. The 2.1 MP rating is in order for most tasks in the scouting camera arena. Properly situated this camera will handle most field tasks very well. Knowing the ability and quirks each of these cameras have a person can pretty well situate the camera in such a manner that it will perform well. We have always loved our Moultrie cameras and the way the company has supported its customers. There was a down period in 05 where there seemed to be many things that caused all the outdoor forums to light up with complaints but this company stuck right in there and kept replacing cameras until now days I rarely see any problems mentioned. This camera can sell any where from just over a hundred dollars to around one hundred forty dollars depending on the source. In high risk areas where there is a chance of theft many folks seek out the less expensive cameras and use some of the security measures mentioned on this site. This camera has features like the laser aim, no loss of program during battery change, front viewable status which we wished we could see on some of the other comparative priced cameras. Trigger time is under one second after wakeup and flash looks to be the same as the Walley World 100 but I will re do this test in the morning to confirm. We just have to get a set of field test pictures and see how good they are. Flash range tests show good flash to 40 feet and this 50 degree morning this camera would sense me at 40 feet also. The sensing range and flash range seem to be very well matched on this camera. As with the Wally world cam this camera has the hard to read LCD screen. The new fine print makes it hard to read in low light conditions like early morning under the canopy of trees. Once we get some test pictures the plan is to match this camera with the Wild view 2 and Bushnell 119200 if our Bushnell is returned from repair in time to do this test in a timely manner.
| Trigger time with
out flash |
  |
|
Trigger time with flash |
  |
|
Flash Tests |
   |
|
Sample Pictures |
Standard resolution
       |
|
High Resolution |
   |
|
Movie |
|
Click Here |
|
|

Moultrie
MFH-DGW-4.0
(2007)
4 MegaPixel
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
|
|

Moultrie
MFH-DGW-4.0
(2008)
4 MegaPixel
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
08 Moultrie D-40 MFH-DGW-4.0 4 MP white flash
camera revisit review 08-15-2008
Being we did a revisit on a couple of the of the I series
cameras and found that they fell on their face this year with some bad trigger
times and some issues with the whiteout problems. I had a hard time locating one
of these cameras in the normal system because they stay sold out. This morning I
visited one of the stores looking for another item when they were stocking the
shelves fresh from the factory cameras. I gobbled up one but had to leave it
lying around for a while until I could get a Bushnell and another camera on its
way to Anthony to do his part. With 6 new batteries in its stomach the cam fired
up and allowed me to program it up in about a minute or two. With the function
switch in the setup mode and a good long hold down of the on power switch I was
able to use the up/down and select switch to get everything done. Back to the
off position and the function switch moved to the auto position and the
countdown started. Of course I had already installed a good clean SD card in the
appropriate slot. I set the cam on the bench in front of the trigger time clock
and with a couple layers of blue masking tape over the flash I did some
unofficial trigger tests. All came out at one second and I
about fell out of my chair with this good news. Now I left it set up and headed
in for a sandwich so I could look to see if this sucker would go into that
dreaded sleep mode. About a half an hour later I made my way back to the cam
without it seeing me and waited for the clock to hit the twelve. The flash went
off and the time recorded (Less than two
seconds), even in the sleep mode this camera is over a second faster
than those high classed Moultrie’s. This camera now has a couple years under its
present design and so far seemed to function very well. The sales in this area
show that it is one of the most popular cameras around. Wal
Mart had 24 Remington Ghosts and zero D-40s The
Ghosts have been there for over two weeks and not even one was sold. With the
two second wake up time and the one second trigger for every picture after that
makes this a very usable camera. Big black and ugly camera is the description
one fellow who was asking to buy one from the store clerk who replied “you mean
the Moultrie digital”? The fellow said “Yea that’s it” when the D-40 came off
the shelf. I spent a little time with him and he became a programming champ in a
very short time and he headed out of the store to the club to hang it on the
tree. I think he just got a little of that addiction that has been rumored
around the forums. I am not going to go through all the description and
measurements because that is all in the original review last year. We are going
to get some flash tests and sensing tests before moving to the hill for the
pictures. For those potential white flash fans who
are waiting to see what the Cudde Capture is going
to do might just want to buy two of these for the same price. The
cudde has what appears to be better pictures and
maybe a little faster trigger but it has not been out there successfully for two
years. We hope it is but we don’t know as of now. There is
just not a lot of fast white flash cams out on the market this year.
08-16-2008 update: The flash range testing went well and the white
flash reached well past forty feet. The sensing range is also forty feet for
this 71 degree morning. Compared to the I and M series 2008 cameras we
tested this year this camera has it all over them with the exception of
picture quality. You could have a stack of these cams for the price of one
of the 60 series cams.
08-27-2008 update: Well all you Moultrie I and M series cameras
that have a 2008 birth date you need to hang your head in shame. Your little
brother just put all you to shame. The pictures in our sample tests are
pretty good for a sub $100 camera. The official trigger time came out to be
around a second (2 seconds after sleep). Even when the camera went to sleep
it still wakes up and snaps a picture more than a second faster than its
more expensive siblings. This camera is being pumped out by some vendors for
as little as $69 and as high as $99 for other vendors. This means that you
could have two of these cameras and not put the same dent in the wallet as
one of those new Capture cameras. The D-40 also has more features and a
company that has stuck behind their products. We are very happy with this
camera and it will be added to our stack of long term cameras to hold a spot
in our inventory of cameras that will stay in the woods.
10-05-2008 update: We have had a
good time with this cam in the field. It has not let us down and
we continue to capture a ton of pictures each week. This cam has
been very good on batteries and somewhat weak in picture quality
but for the price it has just kept on performing. We think this
is a very strong performer for the price and we intend to keep
it in the field until we wear a little of the bark off it. This
review is closed
|
|

Moultrie
I40 IR flash 4.0 MP
(2007)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Security: I made a 7 ½ X ¾ X 1/8 inch
bar (see picture) and drilled a hole in each end to slip a Python cable through
and it appears that this will work just fine for most security situations:

Side view with battery plate removed.
SD card and accessories cables plug in here:

Card Puller:
A three inch piece of good electrical tape, folded in half and stuck to both
sides of the SD card makes card removal easy in
the new M and I series Moultrie cams.


Potential
Leak Issue
1/2 inch piece of 2X4
cut to a length of 4 3/4 inches and beveled on the end to 45% provides
enough support
to the back of the case
so over tightening will not warp the case and prevent the front of the
battery compartment
from a possible water
leak on the I and M series Moultrie.


A simple tin rain guard for I and M series Moultrie cams:


IR Stealth Option:
(see 06-17-07 update)
A small piece of smoked clear plastic 3
1/2 X 1 1/4 inches set in front of the IR emitters inside the case will
possibly
do two things:
1. Tone down the red glow when camera is
triggered to prevent from someone seeing the camera and spooking game.
2. A well camouflaged camera would still
have the bright white square of IR emitters that would give away its
location to that possible trespasser. Covering up the the emitters in this
matter will help conceal the cam.
We made a similar cover for the Leaf
River IR camera and it worked very well and we did not see any noticeable
amount of loss of IR light in our tests. Our test camera was placed in an
area which had a lot of passing traffic and the camera was never detected.

|
MFH-DGS-I40 IR Flash 4 MP camera review 06-09-2007
Having just gone through its big brother the I-60 this camera possesses many
of the same features. Lacking are the higher MP rating, remote feature, and
some of the eye candy that is printed across the bottom of the picture. It
has the
same amount of IR emitters so the flash is the same and the case is black
but maintains the same dimensions. There is three
rez settings which are low, medium, and
enhanced
(interpolated) to reach the 4.0 MP high rating.
Both cameras
function the same as far as flash range, trigger
time and sensing range.
Coming out of the box this camera had the sticky
gasket problem that was mentioned in the 6.0 review. When packed at the
factory the front cover wants to stick to the gasket in some areas and when
the cover is opened it tends to slightly lift the gasket out of its grove.
If this was missed and not slid back in place it could result in a water
leak. Once the gasket was put back in place we did not experience it
becoming loose again during the many times we opened the case. This appears
to only be the case when it is opened fresh out of the box. I did water leak
tests as I did with the Cuddeback cameras and
found no leaks once the gasket was properly re-installed.
The 7 ½ inch bar
described for use with the 6.0 will also work for this camera’s security.
Packing a $100 dollar cheaper price tag than its big brother and me being
more in favor of cameras that take very good low MP pictures (smaller file
size) makes missing those bells and whistles seem less important. If
camo is important to you, just get a roll of
that camo cloth tape that is used to make
archery equipment look like a tree and use it to hide your camera. Just
don’t do to good of a job because this camera does not have that beacon
feature and you cant call it up from a distance.
Finally things in the trail camera business have
brought the suppliers to the point where all the desirable features are
there and the choice gets harder. Moultrie
has began to rock the industry for the second
time (excluding early 06) with this years new cameras. Having trigger times
just over a second and a selection of features that have been talked about
here over the past three years. These appear to be
very good cameras. With all
fingers crossed we are hoping that everyone’s field experience does not
uncover some hidden difficulty. The sleep factor that was rumored to affect
these cameras, did not surface during our testing but we will be putting one
in a situation for a day plus situation without being triggered and see if
we can sneak up on it and catch it in a nap. The camera is presently
deployed on a very sunny open area with a corn feeder and in about week we
will be able to provide some sample pictures. Our private purchase of these
same models through normal channels found no differences in function than
the ones that came straight from the supplier. This is a test that we must do
to prove that by chance we might receive cameras that may have been gone
through prior to us receiving them. This would make it
unfair to the average buyer. To date we have only on one occasion
had this happen with a small company that now seems to feel they are better
off dealing with the industrial research folks than the hunting sports
folks.
With all the information being put out
about good rechargeable batteries and with the new solar panel
(available this fall from Moultrie), this camera with a 4 gig card should be
able to stay out for a very long time without any maintenance. The
next option would be to use the external 12v SLA battery with a 12v panel
hooked directly to the battery. Caution: Do not exceed 15 volts when doing this
according to the folks at Moultrie.
08-14-2007 update: This is another camera that made it to the
field without getting its trigger time tested. The field results are
very impressive and the more we look at this camera the more we would
probably choose this one over its big sister the I60 because we see no
need for that tiny view screen and the remote feature has not been
needed for way we do our scouting. Being cheaper is also a reason to
choose this camera. I have been so totally impressed by the function of
the I 60 that I was not really paying much attention to this camera.
Just having a black case and basically much of the rest is the same,
leaves operational functionality the only issue. Well this camera passed
with flying colors. I do not need a 6 MP camera with those large file
sizes to do my scouting. I cannot say anything bad about the I 60
because it also works very well but it also costs more. The sleep mode
that we kept on looking for is just not there. These cameras will
latterly last a couple months on a set of batteries and take thousands
of pictures. The I 60 has been out over two months and taken over 3k
pictures and 200+ movies and it is still on the hill banging away right
now. The I 40 is there, also, just not as long. Picture quality is very
good and we can not fault this camera in any way on that point. We have
some more rez settings to go through plus the flash and trigger tests to
do and we can go on with the battery life testing.
08-19-2007 update: This can came off the hill just long
enough to get its trigger time tested (less than 2 seconds) and was
put right back out at another rez setting . We are liking about
everything about this camera. Both the day and night pictures have
good quality. Three things about this cam that are needed, 1st
do not tighten the strap to tight when mounting, 2nd
build yourself a locking bar for using a Python lock to secure this
camera, 3rd cross your fingers and hope that Moultrie
gets off their duff and supplies us with a downloadable update to
help with the whiteout issue. With all that in place this is
going to be one hard camera to beat.
08-20-2007 update: The flash range
testing was done this morning and as with the I-60 this cam proved to
have very good illumination past 40 feet. I was doing the Wildview 5
test at the same time and it was remarkable just how much faster this
camera is on trigger time and delay time. I found the delay time to be a
little less than the advertised 1 minute. Sensing range was out past 35
feet which surprised me because the WV-5 could only see me at 25 feet.
76 degrees and sensing testing makes for some difficult times in most
cases but this cam passed with flying colors.
09-22-2007 Moultrie Firmware
(whiteout
update) internet download review: On
one of the outdoor forums there was a comment about this new download to
correct the whiteout issue. This fellow said “I hate to admit this but
Moultrie did a good job putting this
together”. Well, We do not
hate but are glad and happy
that this has finally been accomplished. It is obvious that these folks
did their homework and put together a download that does work.
There was only a couple of minor issues worth mentioning about the whole
process: At one point, the instructions tell you to connect the
USB cable and then copy files onto camera SD card. At this time they
make no mention of the number of screens that must be clicked through in
Windows XP to accomplish this while XP recognizes the new hardware.
These instructions are very precise and must be followed exactly to the
letter. One small glitch occurred twice while we followed the
instruction correctly. This was when we activated the firmware
level 1 update, we got the message "FILE NOT READY". We got this
message 2 to 3 times but just kept trying and it finally loaded the
level 1 firmware correctly.
The overall process is 5 steps for the I series and 4 steps for M
series. Step 3 has you download the firmware files from the Moultrie
website onto your computer. Steps 4 and 5 walk you through loading
the firmware onto the camera and activating the "firmware update"
process. We found the process easy but make sure you follow the
instructions exactly.
09-29-2007 update Moultrie whiteout
upgrade M and I series: This past year we have seen where
companies have outsourced their production overseas are starting to
see problems arise. The pre production units seem to work just fine
but when the post production units start to hit the market there
seems to be a margin of difficulties in function that the users are
finding. We do not know that this is the case with the new I and M
series Moultrie’s but it is
suspected. When these cameras hit the market they seemed to be
exactly what many folks were wanting. We really liked all models and
still do but now that we have gotten deep into the testing we see
that the original problems dealing with the whiteout issue has
mushroomed into a new set of difficulties with these cameras. Most
folks felt that it was more of a hardware issue dealing with the
light sensor than a software issue. This may be true but Moultrie
has attempted to correct this through a firmware upgrade. We have
seen a degree of improvement with the I
series but no change with the M series. We cannot exactly duplicate
the light conditions of the pre download, but we can get close. With
the I series we see a definite
improvement in amount of whiteout, but in this process this firmware
update has created another problem. This problem is the lack of
color pictures during good light conditions. It takes some pretty
strong sunlight before this camera will switch to color. On an
average we are seeing color pictures between 11 AM and 4 PM. During
this period we see that the cameras will sometimes switch back and
forth between monochrome and color. We have seen some reports that
some folks feel that the picture quality has also been degraded
somewhat. With our cameras we cannot state this because of the
varying light conditions on the pre and post pictures. Moultrie
engineers have done lots of work creating this download but we feel
that it is still lacking and still has to be tweaked. The M series
is a total disappointment and just has not been fixed. We are still
getting more than 50% whiteout pictures. On one of our M-40’s it
seemed to get worse after the download. What it has come down to is
that both the I and M series cameras must be taken out from under
the forest canopy and put in the bright sun in order to work
properly. Reports that the trigger time was also
affected has not been proven in our tests. We hope that
Moultrie takes notice and does a little more work on these great
cameras.
**The reviews on the 2007 Moultrie cams will be on hold pending
further feedback from Moultrie concerning issues with the recent
firmware upgrades.
03-16-2008 update: This review was put on hold
waiting for some data from Moultrie so we could complete the review.
They have failed to answer our requests so we will close this
review.
|
|

Moultrie
I40 IR flash 4.0 MP
(2008 REVISITED)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
Moultrie I 40 revisit review 06-15-2008
Last year we did a review on this cam and all the basics remain the same. We
will be only looking at those areas that may have changed in this new look
at this camera. We liked this camera from the start and wrote it up as a
good camera. Then the multitude hit the field and the problems started to
show up under long term use. Things like black out and white out and other
issues were seen. This did not hold true for every cam out there but that
select few took their toll the popularity of this cam. The factory folks
finally got off their duffs and put out some firm ware fixes that eased the
situation somewhat. This is not a perfect cam by any means but has worked
well enough that it has become the most popular camera sold in 07. We have
scheduled some shoot out types of reviews coming up as soon as we get a
handle on all the new cams that we have to review that are new for this
year. This required us to have on hand a new this years model of this cam to
put along side a few of the $200 cameras when we get to those shootout
reviews. In the mean time we will put this camera through a few paces to see
if there are any issues that have not been corrected. I went out and
purchased a fresh from the factory I 40 for this purpose. This is a non
cherry picked cam and is just off the shelf like any normal purchase. The
firm ware on this cam is L1_11037, L2_40704 and the new batteries are
energizers. Trigger times show that is average of 3 seconds. We have
been spoiled by the new tiny Scoutguard cameras and when we get hold of this
big old cam and hang it on the tree it is a little cumbersome. We recently
started a review on one of the new Leaf River cams and it has an external on
off switch which makes it nice when we need to do a card change. With this
cam we have devised a locking bar with a Python cable for security. When we
do the card change we have to remove the cable all the way and open up the
front of the camera and then turn off the switch. Then we need to open the
battery compartment to get into the card during the change. Then we have to
reverse the procedure to secure it back on the tree and re aim. Not a big
price to pay but aggravating none the less. Even with these minor issues we
still like this camera so far and it has worked well for us. We are going to
take a very close look to make sure 08 is a better year for this cam and see
if we can say “we really like this cam”.
|
|
Moultrie
I60 IR flash 6.0 MP
(2007)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com

Security: I made a 7 ½ X ¾ X 1/8 inch
bar (see picture) and drilled a hole in each end to slip a Python cable through
and it appears that this will work just fine for most security situations:

Side view with battery plate removed.
SD card and accessories cables plug in here:

Card Puller:
A three inch piece of good electrical tape, folded in half and stuck to both
sides of the SD card makes card removal easy in
the new M and I series Moultrie cams.


Potential Leak Issue
1/2 inch piece of 2X4
cut to a length of 4 3/4 inches and beveled on the end to 45% provides
enough support
to the back of the case
so over tightening will not warp the case and prevent the front of the
battery compartment
from a possible water
leak on the I and M series Moultrie.


A simple tin rain guard for I and M series Moultrie cams:


IR Stealth Option:
(see
06-17-07 update)
A small piece of smoked clear plastic 3
1/2 X 1 1/4 inches set in front of the IR emitters inside the case will
possibly
do two things:
1. Tone down the red glow when camera is
triggered to prevent from someone seeing the camera and spooking game.
2. A well camouflaged camera would still
have the bright white square of IR emitters that would give away its
location to that possible trespasser. Covering up the the emitters in this
matter will help conceal the cam.
We made a similar cover for the Leaf
River IR camera and it worked very well and we did not see any noticeable
amount of loss of IR light in our tests. Our test camera was placed in an
area which had a lot of passing traffic and the camera was never detected.

|
5-26-2007:
First look at the new Moultrie I 60 IR flash 6.0 MP with on
board viewer. This is a very impressive looking camera and new for this year
they have chosen to do a all new case design. The
massive IR array appears to be of single focus compared to the Leaf River
array which uses different focus IR emitters in their arrays. This 72 count
array should do a good job in the illumination area and is advertised as
being good to 50 feet. Our tests will take a close look at this. This camera
can be set up in any one of 4 resolutions from VGA up to 6.0. New for this
year Moultrie has included a built in viewer for those folks who wish to see
the results of the cameras performance in the field. I want to take a close
look at the color day and IR night functions of this camera because it
appears it is being done through one lens. This may incorporate a mechanical
filter to accomplish this task. It will be interesting to put it to task in
the field. Pictures will be stamped with the standard time and date along
with temperature, moon phase and barometric pressure. External power port is
also incorporated which is a big plus and this can also be used with the not
yet available solar panel which is suppose to maintain six rechargeable D
cells if you chose to go that route. Moultrie advertises this camera as
being able to perform up to
150 days on 6 good alkaline batteries which is some very good news. Grape
vine has it that this is accomplished by having the camera to go into a
sleep mode with a 1 to 2 second wakeup time then the camera will go into the
instant trigger time mode. This is one of the areas that
seems to be of great interest to a lot of folks so we will be paying
close attention to this detail.
With all the information being put out
about good rechargeable batteries and with the new solar panel
(available this fall), this camera with a 4 gig card should be
able to stay out for a very long time without any maintenance. The
next option would be to use the external 12v SLA battery with a 12v panel
hooked directly to the battery. Caution: Do not exceed 15 volts when doing this
according to the folks at Moultrie.
The built in security feature and remote beacon feature is
also a plus for this camera. I am going to be doing a lot of work to come up
with some type of extra security for this fine camera to insure that it
doesn’t get legs and wander off with one of the occasional uninvited
visitors to our properties. Being this cam is so very new and has a lot of
features this review will probably be very long and intense, unless we have
some type of an unanticipated
failure.
06-09-2007
Update: The OD green case measures
about 11 inches tall and is 6 ½ wide with a depth of about 4 inches. A
single thumb screw will open the case that is hinged in the top. This
front cover has some sort of detent built into the hinge to hold it in
the open position for programming. The right side of the case has a
removable cover 5 ½ by 2 ½ inches that is
held on by two more thumb screws. Under this cover is the battery
compartment which has a hinged retainer for the batteries which also has
another thumb screw.
Just in front of the battery compartment is the
USB, SD card, and TV out slots. Once the batteries are installed there
is only a small recessed area (see picture) to access the SD card slot.
Winter time installation of the card would be impossible with gloves on.
I can see that folks will probably do the same with the card with the
tape trick or tweezers as we saw on other cameras which had card access
issues.
Mounting the camera is done by a narrow strap (provided
) through two slots in the back of the cam. There is an
adjustable thumb screw at the top of the back of the cam which has a
point to hit the tree and allow for angle adjustment for aiming. Bad
news when we opened all of our cameras up and found that the small
rubber seal that is suppose to be the water seal, has a tendency to
stick to the front cover when the door is opened it gets pulled out of
its small track which it is suppose to be seated in. We had to very
carefully reinstall this seal on each camera. Once put back in place, it
appeared to stay in the track. We will have to see what happens when the
camera has a prolonged stay in the field and is opened up for the card
and battery change. Folks should with new cameras should inspect this
seal and make sure it is in place and not twisted in order to insure
water tightness.
As we suspected the color day and IR night pictures is
accomplished with a mechanical filter that worked very well with no
hang-ups like we experienced in the 07 Bushnell recently tested.
Programming is very much like all the older models and is easy and
straight forward. Playing around in the yard with my wife’s flowers in the
background proved that this cameras daytime pictures on the low setting
produced very sharp and clear pictures. When we did a quick check of the
trigger time in a dark hallway we concluded that this camera is pretty
fast. This was judged buy seeing how quick the IR array came on and not
by the clock. We found on a previously tested camera that just because
the IR array was on that did not mean the picture was being taken during
the first micro seconds of the flash. This will be done in front of our
testing clock soon. Because of this narrow access to the SD card I had
on two occasions failed to have the card fully seated and after
extensive testing I had to access the internal memory in order to view
the results. Care must be taken when putting the card in and insure it
is seated all the way in.
The view screen is inside the front cover and
is very small and we found it lacking when trying to see detail in the
field.
The flash range tests showed that this large array lit up the
world out to 60 feet easily. The sensing range on this 72 degree morning
was 40 feet and during the day, which was 96 degrees it consistently
would catch me walking across at 20 feet and pretty well center me in
the picture. The burst mode (3 pictures) were
10 to 13 seconds apart.
Providing security for this camera is greatly on
my mind and presently looks like a 1 inch wide bar through the strap
slots with holes in the end to accept a python cable is going to be our
approach. I will work on this today and try to get some pictures out.
The normal security code can also be programmed in for those who still
have enough memory to use it. Me I would forget the code and loose my
note telling me what is was supposed to be. Some folks call this as
having a senior moment.
The documentation (10 pages) is well written and
easy to follow. We were able to do all the programming and changes
without having to refer to the booklet. I will say that so far I am
extremely impressed with
Moultrie's new cameras. They are fixing to put a hurtin on
a lot of competition if the trigger times prove to be as fast as we
think they are and because the picture quality and functionality of this
camera is definitely there. It is hang it on the tree time.
06-17-2007 update:
Before and after tests using this cover showed that the IR light
was noticeably decreased on the Moultrie but was not
as noticeable on the Leaf river. Flash was still good past 30 feet
but the background foliage was very dark. It would still be a good
idea to use this when a higher degree of camera concealment is
needed. (see comparison photos below)
07-13-2007 I-60 remote
feature: To test the remote
function of the I-60 I went into the program and selected
handheld and remote. I set the cam on a stand watching a small
fountain on my back deck just outside the sliding glass doors.
During the hot afternoon sun the finches really like to come and
take a bath. As they would arrive I would hit the capture button
and the picture would be taken. I then selected 15 second movie
and put it back on PIR just to see if the camera would see the
birds and trigger a movie. Well, it worked great. I was assuming
that the movement of the water would also trigger the cam but it
did not. This widens the use of this great camera. You bird
watchers need to go to the local sporting goods store and ask
for a Moultrie I-60 and get yourself set up for some great fun
08-05-2007 update: This camera
has continued to run and take pictures on its original batteries now
and the count is over 2000 pictures plus 200 movies and the battery
reads in the 50% area. Even with what some folks are complaining
about the whiteout thing this cam continues to amaze us. The
noticeable clunk when the cam decides to execute a picture is
somewhat bothering. We have had many of the pictures taken by this
cam where the animals are really wondering what is going on and are
looking directly at the cam. In a situation where the prize ol buck
is sneaking through this might cause him to take notice. Even with
our feeder/cam wise crowd, they take notice and do look at where the
noise is coming from. The noticeable challenge by stealth with the
I-450 and its performance has been noticed even though the 450 is
not IR it is still in the running because of its excellent
performance. Another cam that has risen in popularity on some of the
outdoor forums is the Bushnell 11-9302. We really like the fact that
when products hit the market and folks find it hard to choose we
feel that the manufactures have taken notice. Soon the new Recon 5.0
will be with us and it will probably also be opening some eyes as
all of its predecessors did. Right now this cam rules.
08-13-2007 update: I just pulled
another 557 photos off this camera. It is still on its
original set of Duracell batteries and has taken a total of over
2500 pics and 250+ movies. I compared the rate of pics from
cooler times to that of the last 6 days. Keep in mind we've
had 100+ degree days. I see only a fall off of around 10% and
this could be due to deer movement. This is excellent
sensing for a camera still reading 43% on battery level.
08-14-2007 update: More than two
months have passed and the batteries are showing mighty low but
this camera just keeps on taking pictures. Very good pictures at
that. The whiteout issue is barely noticeable now when we place
the cam where it gets more of the light away from the heavy
canopy of the trees. Moultrie has done an exceptional job on
this camera this year. The view screen on this cam has become a
bother and my extensive attempts to try to utilize this feature
is becoming pretty frustrating. It will tell you that you have a
picture but very little else because the detail is so small that
my attempts to use a magnifying glass failed. The other feature
that needs to be discussed is the remote. My investigation on
this showed that very few folks use this feature. I tested it
and it did work great but for a scouting camera it would
probably be of little use. If you could do without the very high
MP (6.0) rating and the view screen and remote, this would make
this cameras little sister (the I 40) look pretty good. Same
case, same battery life, great pictures, and a cheaper cost. I
forgot, you would also have to put up with that black case. What
I am really saying is that both cameras are great performers and
when cost is an issue a look at the lower priced I-40.
09-22-2007 Moultrie
Firmware (whiteout
update) internet download review:
On one of the outdoor forums there was a comment about this new
download to correct the whiteout issue. This fellow said “I hate to
admit this but Moultrie did a good
job putting this together”. Well, We do
not hate but are glad
and happy that this has finally been accomplished. It is obvious
that these folks did their homework and put together a download that
does work.
There was only a couple of minor issues worth mentioning about the
whole process: At one point, the instructions tell you to
connect the USB cable and then copy files onto camera SD card. At
this time they make no mention of the number of screens that must be
clicked through in Windows XP to accomplish this while XP recognizes
the new hardware. These instructions are very precise and must
be followed exactly to the letter. One small glitch occurred twice
while we followed the instruction correctly. This was when we
activated the firmware level 1 update, we got the message "FILE NOT
READY". We got this message 2 to 3 times but just kept trying
and it finally loaded the level 1 firmware correctly.
The overall process is 5 steps for the I series and 4 steps for M
series. Step 3 has you download the firmware files from the Moultrie
website onto your computer. Steps 4 and 5 walk you through
loading the firmware onto the camera and activating the "firmware
update" process. We found the process easy but make sure you
follow the instructions exactly.
09-29-2007 update Moultrie whiteout upgrade M and I series:
This past year we have seen where companies have outsourced
their production overseas are starting to see problems arise. The
pre production units seem to work just fine but when the post
production units start to hit the market there seems to be a margin
of difficulties in function that the users are finding. We do not
know that this is the case with the new I and M series
Moultrie’s but it is suspected. When these
cameras hit the market they seemed to be exactly what many folks
were wanting. We really liked all models and still do but now that
we have gotten deep into the testing we see that the original
problems dealing with the whiteout issue has mushroomed into a new
set of difficulties with these cameras. Most folks felt that it was
more of a hardware issue dealing with the light sensor than a
software issue. This may be true but Moultrie has attempted to
correct this through a firmware upgrade. We have seen a degree of
improvement with the I series but no
change with the M series. We cannot exactly duplicate the light
conditions of the pre download, but we can get close. With
the I series we see a definite
improvement in amount of whiteout, but in this process this firmware
update has created another problem. This problem is the lack of
color pictures during good light conditions. It takes some pretty
strong sunlight before this camera will switch to color. On an
average we are seeing color pictures between 11 AM and 4 PM. During
this period we see that the cameras will sometimes switch back and
forth between monochrome and color. We have seen some reports that
some folks feel that the picture quality has also been degraded
somewhat. With our cameras we cannot state this because of the
varying light conditions on the pre and post pictures. Moultrie
engineers have done lots of work creating this download but we feel
that it is still lacking and still has to be tweaked. The M series
is a total disappointment and just has not been fixed. We are still
getting more than 50% whiteout pictures. On one of our M-40’s it
seemed to get worse after the download. What it has come down to is
that both the I and M series cameras must be taken out from under
the forest canopy and put in the bright sun in order to work
properly. Reports that the trigger time was also
affected has not been proven in our tests. We hope that
Moultrie takes notice and does a little more work on these great
cameras.
**The reviews on the 2007 Moultrie cams will be on hold pending
further feedback from Moultrie concerning issues with the recent
firmware upgrades.
03-16-2008
update: This review was put on hold waiting for some
data from Moultrie so we could complete the review. They have failed to
answer our requests so we will close this review.
Without Smoked IR
Cover

With Smoked IR Cover

|
Note: On the trigger tests below, don't be confused by a second
hand shadow off to the right.
Trigger time with
out flash 1.5 seconds |
  |
Trigger time with flash 1.5 Seconds |
  |
| Flash Tests |
  |
| Sample Pictures |
Low resolution
      |
| High Resolution |
     
Note: during the transition hours, morning and evening, we got
several washouts. This is due to the low light under the
forest canopy and the flash going off during these periods.
 |
Movie
(The following clips are originals in original size
and highest quality setting. Daytime clips are 15 seconds and
night clips are 5 seconds) |

(The following is a video I made that
consists of around 200 movie clips I got off the camera and placed
end to end, then time compressed by a factor of 7 and set to a Joe
Satriani sound track. This is not the original quality.
It is around 3 minutes long)
Make
sure you check out the videos of the birds in a birdbath above too!
|
|
|
Moultrie
I60 IR flash 6.0 MP
(2008)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
 |
Moultrie I 60 (2008) revisited review - July 22,
2008
Because of the degree of differences we found between the 07 and 08 I 40’s we
decided to reach down in the old piggy bank and buy a 08 I-60 from an average
vendor so we were guaranteed that it had not been gone over. Out of the box both
gaskets for the main door and battery cover came out when those compartments
were opened. Two hours later and about half blind I was able to stick that black
spaghetti looking stuff back in where it was suppose to be. Further inspection
of the case was without other issues except one of the battery cover screws was
very tight and I had to play with it a little to get it to seat all the way in.
Into the box and scooped up $8 worth of D cells and a good clean SD card and off
to the trigger time table. I chose only to do the “with flash” tests because
they are normally somewhat slower than without flash. Each time I triggered the
cam I noticed the IR array would come on instantly and remained on for about 5
seconds. I was getting pretty excited and figured that we were going to have a
very fast cam to brag about. A little over an hour of this and I was back to the
office to view the results. You have seen these devices that have the little
slide with a turtle on one end and a rabbit on the other. Well you can set this
slide all the way to the turtle side. Trigger times are around 3.5
seconds. What a disappointment for
Moultrie’s flag ship. This just sucks, and I do not understand how this has
passed the QC folks over there in Alabama. I assume that someone just figured
that when folks see the IR array come on that would indicate the speed but just
because the flash goes off it does not mean that the picture is shuttered at
that same time. I feel like someone dropped me off on the second floor and I
just now hit the bottom. If it was bright orange I could probably make a pretty
good 1000 yard target out of it. We are sure getting a stack of feeder cameras
and the stack with trail cameras in it is not very big. This is a three hundred
dollar camera, but it performs like a much lesser valued camera. The $115
Stealth I-540 IR will probably stand side by side with this camera and it will
do 120 second nighttime videos. This is not good, come on Moultrie.
09-04-2008 update: Oops, this one slipped through the crack and
got stuck behind the trigger time station for a while. I guess because of
its sorry performance we really did not miss it very much. It did make it to
the hill but was pulled because about 99% of the pictures had no color. It
will go back out for some more sample pictures and we will also try to catch
a video also. This is going to be very short because of its lack of
performance.
09-09-2008
update: Had a good time on the hill and captured a lot of
pictures. This camera seems to work well but just wants to stay in that
black and white mode all day long. We are getting a low percentage of
pictures that are actually color but those mono pictures seem to have good
detail I get the feeling that we have a wanta be Reconyx RM-45 on our hands.
It is not even close to being like the 07 model that has the same name.
10-05-2008 update: This revisit can pick out some
strong points. The day/night pictures that are outside the white and black
out times are very good. The battery life is exceptional. We have had no
failures with this cam. Now the bad points, trigger time is very slow, a big
degree of pictures during transition times are not readable. We have
recorded so many empty pictures (missed shots) that it is becoming hard to
deploy this cam in any situation other than a feeder type of situation.
Let’s hope that Moultrie gets off the stick and ties a knot in someone’s
underwear in China and gets their great cams back in line with acceptable
trigger times and no more whiteout pictures. This concludes this review.
|

Moultrie
M60 Std flash 6.0 MP
(2007)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
DGS-M60
Moultrie review 07-11-2007
This cam
comes with the same OD green case as the I 60 model we just finished
reviewing. In place of the IR array this cam has an impressive looking flash
which has diffuser bars built into the glass which will probably spread the
flash out nicely. The front cover is detent controlled so it will stay open
when it is hung on the tree. Every thing including the programming is the
same as the I 60. The rez
settings are VGA, 1.3, 3.0, and Enhanced (interpolated) to 6.0 MP. The movie
mode resolution settings are 320X240 on low and 640X480 on high. As with
the I 60 this cam also will take up to a 4 gig SD
card. Programming is easy and strait forward and was accomplished without
having to use the pamphlet. The PIR sensing is 45 degrees and the optical
field of view is out to about 50 degrees. I installed 6 (pre tested)
duracells and am going to do my first impression
tests then in the morning I will get the flash and sensing range testing
done. Presently it is being held for the “sleep” test to see in Moultrie
tried to sneak that past us. I pulled my I60 out of the field this morning
after an extended stay and the batteries still read 99%.
Lets hope this M series has the same appetite. Equipped with a built
in viewer, this cam will allow the user to view the card contents in the
field. This is a very small viewer and I found with my bi focal glasses that
details are hard to pick out in even the best conditions. Bright sunlight
makes the use of the viewer very hard to see. We still just swap the cards
and due the viewing on the laptop or home computer. The same caution must be
taken with this cam when mounting to insure that the strap is not over
tightened. If the strap is over tightened the loop on the back of the cam
will make the battery compartment shift a small amount which could result in
a water leak. We have a small
wood block fix which prevents this. I was told today that Moultrie also
has a fix for this but I have yet to be able to confirm this. Security for
this cam uses password protection and our
security bar with Python
cable will help prevent theft. The need to extend the
SD card with tape also
applies this cam. My stubby old fingers just do not want to fit down in that
crevice to remove it. We have been extremely pleased with the function of
the I series cams and feel that this white flash
M series will be just as good. The raising of the rubber weather seal we
experienced on the I series did not happen with this cam so maybe it was
just a fluke that it happened on the IR I series cams we opened for the
first time. With the I series we had to install
the small card for the remote but this cam came with it in place and ready
to use. The beacon (cam locater) can be used for those who loose track of
just where they put their cam. I had fun with the remote feature by putting
the cam on a bird bath and setting back with one of my favorite beverages
and when the birds would jump in for a bath I would just hit the button and
capture the action. With the I series cams we
found that there was a tendency for the water drops to dry on the lens and
cause a water mark which showed up in the pictures. These cameras are
plagued with that dreaded whiteout thing where they are confused at day
light and dusk, so our old practice of putting a roof over the cam cannot be
done because it would further limit the amount of light going to the light
sensor to control the flash. I am in the process of designing a clear
plastic hood that would let the light through but keep the rain off. I have
not figured out the angle to do this so that we do not get the flash coming
back on the cam reflecting off the hood. I will try to get this done this
coming week. The folks at Moultrie are working over time to insure that any
thing that comes up with the 07 I and M series cams is taken care of in a
timely manner. We hope to have a downloadable fix coming very soon for that
minor whiteout issue. Well it is off to the fun stuff now.
Well the fun stuff
came to a halt when the battery cover gasket came out of its groove and
then it was a 2 hour ordeal putting it back in the groove with the help
of my table magnifier and a half box of toothpicks. It appears that the
design is for it to be held in place by pressure fit. As did with the I
60 (front cover gasket) this gasket stuck to the battery compartment lid
and when I removed it the first time I was unaware that it had stuck to
the cover. It is back in place now and I have pulled the lid several
times and it appears to stay in place. My first sleep mode test came at
two hours and the cam triggered in what was about two seconds. I am
going to do an over night test on it to double check the sleep mode.
During one of my indoor tests the flash caught me dead in the eyes
though it was bright it did not blind me like the Stealth I 450 did. We
will find out in the morning when we do the flash test.
07-12-2007 update:
This cam spent the night fired up and this morning I triggered it to see
if it had gone to sleep and could not see any difference in trigger time
which appears to be around 2 seconds. The flash range test showed good
coverage past 40 feet and the sensing on this cam was very lacking. I
performed this test several times. The temperature this morning at 4 AM
was 70 (camera showed 75 degrees)
degrees and this cam would only catch me at about 20 feet. Not
believing the results I pulled my I-60 out and put it side by side with
this cam and the I-60 would get me past 40 feet every time but the M-60
would only see me at about 20 to 25 feet. I feel there must be a problem
with this cam and I will return it to Moultrie later to have them look
at it. The battery door gasket appears to want to stay in place now that
it has been re installed.
07-20-2007 update: This cam was
being readied for its trip to the woods and the battery door gasket
wanted to come loose again. We had to reinstall it several times during
the trigger time tests. We think we now have it in place and hope it
stays there for its trip to the outdoors. The sample pictures show sharp
and clear and the suspected sensing issue did not hinder the
performance. In 80 plus degrees it was sensing a rabbit at 20 feet so
maybe my early morning tests were not valid. The white out issue is
still there and we got a few during the morning and afternoon testing.
One of our previous tests on a 06 Cudde cam we found that the camera
lens looked off to one side. Well, it happened again with this cam. With
the camera properly set to watch the target area, its lens looked very
low and we had to raise the bottom of the camera in order to keep the
animals in the center of the picture. This was a minor adjustment but it
shows that test pictures should be done prior to hanging it on a tree in
order to know how to aim your camera. We are favorably impressed with
this cams over all performance.
08-14-2007 update:
With a half a dozen cams in the mill this fellow got shelved and
nearly forgotten. I was reviewing some of the reports and found that we
needed to get on with this review so we pulled out another new M-60 from
the box to put along side of this cam to maybe validate whether or not
we had a problem on this cam. I need to also state that this last M-60
to come out of the box did not have any difficulties with any of the
gaskets. This is on going and we should see the results on the
comparison in a couple days. We are also in process of testing the M-40
at this time and feel that we may find that we will find the same
comparison between these two cams as we did with the I-40 and I-60. We
discovered a battery issue with the first M-60 and assume that is what
was causing our difficulties. We will know more about this in the coming
weeks.
08-22-2007 update: With a new set of batteries and
placed side by side with other I and M series cameras this camera
still failed to sense the way the other cameras did. Most of the
cameras were getting over 300 pictures and this cam only took 60 so
we are very sure that this cam does have a sensing issue. I pulled
it and got it off to its origin for a replacement. As soon as it
comes in we will continue the test. We still have the other M-60 in
the field and it seems to be doing very good.
09-22-2007 Moultrie
Firmware (whiteout
update) internet download review:
On one of the outdoor forums there was a comment about this new
download to correct the whiteout issue. This fellow said “I hate to
admit this but Moultrie did a good
job putting this together”. Well, We do
not hate but are glad
and happy that this has finally been accomplished. It is obvious
that these folks did their homework and put together a download that
does work.
There was only a couple of minor issues worth mentioning about the
whole process: At one point, the instructions tell you to
connect the USB cable and then copy files onto camera SD card. At
this time they make no mention of the number of screens that must be
clicked through in Windows XP to accomplish this while XP recognizes
the new hardware. These instructions are very precise and must
be followed exactly to the letter. One small glitch occurred twice
while we followed the instruction correctly. This was when we
activated the firmware level 1 update, we got the message "FILE NOT
READY". We got this message 2 to 3 times but just kept trying
and it finally loaded the level 1 firmware correctly.
The overall process is 5 steps for the I series and 4 steps for M
series. Step 3 has you download the firmware files from the Moultrie
website onto your computer. Steps 4 and 5 walk you through
loading the firmware onto the camera and activating the "firmware
update" process. We found the process easy but make sure you
follow the instructions exactly.
09-29-2007 update Moultrie whiteout upgrade M and I series:
This past year we have seen where companies have outsourced
their production overseas are starting to see problems arise. The
pre production units seem to work just fine but when the post
production units start to hit the market there seems to be a margin
of difficulties in function that the users are finding. We do not
know that this is the case with the new I and M series
Moultrie’s but it is suspected. When these
cameras hit the market they seemed to be exactly what many folks
were wanting. We really liked all models and still do but now that
we have gotten deep into the testing we see that the original
problems dealing with the whiteout issue has mushroomed into a new
set of difficulties with these cameras. Most folks felt that it was
more of a hardware issue dealing with the light sensor than a
software issue. This may be true but Moultrie has attempted to
correct this through a firmware upgrade. We have seen a degree of
improvement with the I series but no
change with the M series. We cannot exactly duplicate the light
conditions of the pre download, but we can get close. With
the I series we see a definite
improvement in amount of whiteout, but in this process this firmware
update has created another problem. This problem is the lack of
color pictures during good light conditions. It takes some pretty
strong sunlight before this camera will switch to color. On an
average we are seeing color pictures between 11 AM and 4 PM. During
this period we see that the cameras will sometimes switch back and
forth between monochrome and color. We have seen some reports that
some folks feel that the picture quality has also been degraded
somewhat. With our cameras we cannot state this because of the
varying light conditions on the pre and post pictures. Moultrie
engineers have done lots of work creating this download but we feel
that it is still lacking and still has to be tweaked. The M series
is a total disappointment and just has not been fixed. We are still
getting more than 50% whiteout pictures. On one of our M-40’s it
seemed to get worse after the download. What it has come down to is
that both the I and M series cameras must be taken out from under
the forest canopy and put in the bright sun in order to work
properly. Reports that the trigger time was also
affected has not been proven in our tests. We hope that
Moultrie takes notice and does a little more work on these great
cameras.
12-24-2007 update: We have had a
period of time waiting on the folks at Moultrie to formulate the
level 2 update so we can proceed with this review. We have taken two
M-60’s and upgraded both to level one update and then this week we
took one of the cams and upgraded it to level 2 upgrade. They both
have new batteries and are now side by side with identical settings
to see if we can evaluate just how much better the level 2 upgrade
performs over the one without the new level 2 upgrade. Should this
work then we can say that we have our hands on a pretty fantastic
cam. It will probably take a week to get the results but we feel
that the long delay by Moultrie in getting this out means that they
took their time and did it right.
01-05-2008 update: With perfect
sensing weather and a good chance to see just where we are at
with the upgrade. The side by side test did show that the level
2 upgrade made a difference in the amount of whiteouts. We did
still get a couple of those dreaded pictures, but only two
compared to the unmodified camera which had many more. During
this test we also stuck one of our M-40 alongside. This is an
unmodified cam and the 40 series had a bunch of whiteouts also.
The big difference was that the M-40 took more that twice as
many pictures. We had corn piles at 5 ft. spaces and hoped to
see just where each of these cameras lost its sensing. With the
amount of tree rats and doves visiting the piles along with a
pretty good herd of deer, we did not have a pile that did not
have a critter on it. So our sensing test did not work. Once the
piles are gone we will start out at 30 feet with a single pile
and move in until the cameras start tp pick up the deer. This
time of year I would think most cameras would be seeing the deer
at 60 to 70 feet easily with these cold temperatures. Our gut
feeling is that the upgrade firm ware does not affect the
cameras sensing ability. We still want to prove this with more
tests.
02-09-2008 update: This has been
a long drawn out test and after many days of side by side
testing, we have concluded that the upgrade to the M series
cameras have transformed these cameras into some real
performers. Folks have to also realize that all this testing has
been done during the cold months and we had no forest canopy to
limit light to the cameras. We feel that once the trees begin to
fill out in the spring the whiteout situation will slowly start
to happen again but what we have seen so far this should be only
on occasion and on gray days. On occasion we see some bad press
on some forums about Moultrie, but this is mostly limited to
customer service, which has slid down hill a little. This will
pretty well conclude the review until we receive the new
battery/panel configuration for testing. Then we feel that this
camera with its already great battery life will be improved once
again.
03-16-2008 update: This is the
closure of this review. As with all its predecessors this camera
still remains one of our favorites. We have basically punished
this cam to the limit and it just stays out there and delivers.
We are now waiting on the 08 cams to start a new year.
| |
Trigger time with
out flash (3 seconds)
 |
| |
Trigger time with flash
(3 seconds)
 |
|
|
| Flash Tests |
  |
| Sample Pictures |
Low resolution
          |
| High Resolution |
                 
We noticed the occasional white out photo in the mornings and
evenings:

|
| Movie |
|
Sample 1 |
|

Moultrie
M40 Std flash 4.0 MP
(2007)
http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
Moultrie M-40
review 08-14-2007
We have been up to our necks with
Moultrie cameras this past month. We first started with all
the I series and then the M series. The higher
end 60 cams were looked at and found to be some seriously fine cameras. Then
we started to shift to the cheaper 40 cams and discovered that we were
getting the same great performance just less some higher
rez settings, view screen, and remote.
All this with a much cheaper price. We compared
the black case to the green case and feel that both will fit in the woods
with the same amount of attention needed to conceal it from unwanted eyes.
Just having a lower rez setting does not make
this camera a weaker performer. It just means that you will have to deal
with much smaller file sizes and have no problems Emailing a couple to your
friends. The pictures are very good, both day and night. The color hue is
more to the natural looking and does not have that orange look seen on some
of the Cuddeback pictures.
The I and M series all have the same method of programming and I
laughed when I was reviewing one of the outdoor forums and seen where
someone has said that “Moultries are so easy
even a caveman could do it”. Please also remember not to tighten the strap
to much when mounting this camera to the tree. This can result in the edge
of the battery compartment being pulled open a little where water could
enter the camera. We have a fix
for this by just using a small piece of wood cut from a 2X4. The
down side of this is if you use this fix it prevents you from using the
locking bar
to secure your camera. The documentation is
the same as the others and is understood easily and useful. My old v 232 GS
100 is still poking around and giving us some pretty great shots. When I
first stuck that cam in the woods I thought that things could not get much
better. Well time has stirred the production pot and it seems like everyone
is hooked on this high MP cameras that pump out mega pictures. This camera
can be turned down to 1.3 and believe me that is plenty and the pictures are
just about anyone needs for scouting. In some cases where a picture is taken
at a bad angle or light conditions cause a problem someone might find the
need to do a zoom to try to figure out dome detail. These cases are normally
rare and unless you are working for the national magazine and need that
detail it not needed. We have the whole series of test to do to this camera
so this is just the page one in a series of many.
09-16-2007 update: With the stack of cams that are in the
pool to move through the various stages of a review, this cam got set on
the bottom shelf for a while. I pulled it back out and started some
serious looks at its features and maybe discrepancies. While scanning
some of the 60 or so forums looking for issues dealing with these
cameras, I kept seeing some folks reporting that they wanted to stay
away from this camera because of it having the dreaded sleep mode.
What has happened is that I believe that there has been a degree of
confusion between the D-40 and the M-40. The cheaper D-40 does
have the battery saving sleep mode. This morning I completed a 12 hour
test and could not find anything but a continuous two second trigger no
matter what I did. So this camera does not have any sleep mode issues
that I could discover. What I did discover is that the flash range is
well past 40 feet and on this 70 degree morning it would continuously
sense me at 50 feet. When I measured the delay period I found it to be a
little less than what the setting was. During the high rez picture
quality round, Anthony did not mention to me anything about whiteout
with this camera. We however did see that happen with one of our M-60
cameras. We will proceed on through the low rez and movie testing and if
we should experience any difficulties we will report that. So far this
camera has been a pure pleasure to work with. Our plan is to also team
this cam up with a side by side shootout with its direct competitor the
Stealth I-450, using the same delay and rez settings. We went back and
re purchased another I-450 just for this test and to do a long range
comparison between these two cameras. A couple of months on a set of
batteries and a couple thousand pictures is a hard reputation for other
manufactures to match.
09-22-2007 Moultrie Firmware
(whiteout
update) internet download review: On
one of the outdoor forums there was a comment about this new download to
correct the whiteout issue. This fellow said “I hate to admit this but
Moultrie did a good job putting this
together”. Well, We do not
hate but are glad and happy
that this has finally been accomplished. It is obvious that these folks
did their homework and put together a download that does work.
There was only a couple of minor issues worth mentioning about the whole
process: At one point, the instructions tell you to connect the
USB cable and then copy files onto camera SD card. At this time they
make no mention of the number of screens that must be clicked through in
Windows XP to accomplish this while XP recognizes the new hardware.
These instructions are very precise and must be followed exactly to the
letter. One small glitch occurred twice while we followed the
instruction correctly. This was when we activated the firmware
level 1 update, we got the message "FILE NOT READY". We got this
message 2 to 3 times but just kept trying and it finally loaded the
level 1 firmware correctly.
The overall process is 5 steps for the I series and 4 steps for M
series. Step 3 has you download the firmware files from the Moultrie
website onto your computer. Steps 4 and 5 walk you through loading
the firmware onto the camera and activating the "firmware update"
process. We found the process easy but make sure you follow the
instructions exactly.
09-29-2007 update Moultrie whiteout upgrade M and I series:
This past year we have seen where companies have outsourced their
production overseas are starting to see problems arise. The pre
production units seem to work just fine but when the post production
units start to hit the market there seems to be a margin of difficulties
in function that the users are finding. We do not know that this is the
case with the new I and M series
Moultrie’s but it is suspected. When these cameras hit the market they
seemed to be exactly what many folks were wanting. We really liked all
models and still do but now that we have gotten deep into the testing we
see that the original problems dealing with the whiteout issue has
mushroomed into a new set of difficulties with these cameras. Most folks
felt that it was more of a hardware issue dealing with the light sensor
than a software issue. This may be true but Moultrie has attempted to
correct this through a firmware upgrade. We have seen a degree of
improvement with the I series but no change
with the M series. We cannot exactly duplicate the light conditions of
the pre download, but we can get close. With the I
series we see a definite improvement in amount of whiteout, but in this
process this firmware update has created another problem. This problem
is the lack of color pictures during good light conditions. It takes
some pretty strong sunlight before this camera will switch to color. On
an average we are seeing color pictures between 11 AM and 4 PM. During
this period we see that the cameras will sometimes switch back and forth
between monochrome and color. We have seen some reports that some folks
feel that the picture quality has also been degraded somewhat. With our
cameras we cannot state this because of the varying light conditions on
the pre and post pictures. Moultrie engineers have done lots of work
creating this download but we feel that it is still lacking and still
has to be tweaked. The M series is a total disappointment and just has
not been fixed. We are still getting more than 50% whiteout pictures. On
one of our M-40’s it seemed to get worse after the download. What it has
come down to is that both the I and M series cameras must be taken out
from under the forest canopy and put in the bright sun in order to work
properly. Reports that the trigger time was also
affected has not been proven in our tests. We hope that Moultrie
takes notice and does a little more work on these great cameras.
02-09-2008 update: This has been a long drawn out test and
after many days of side by side testing, we have concluded that the
upgrade to the M series cameras have transformed these cameras into some
real performers. Folks have to also realize that all this testing has
been done during the cold months and we had no forest canopy to limit
light to the cameras. We feel that once the trees begin to fill out in
the spring the whiteout situation will slowly start to happen again but
what we have seen so far this should be only on occasion and on gray
days. On occasion we see some bad press on some forums about Moultrie,
but this is mostly limited to customer service, which has slid down hill
a little. This will pretty well conclude the review until we receive the
new battery/panel configuration for testing. Then we feel that this
camera with its already great battery life will be improved once again.
03-16-2008 update: This is the closure of this review. As
with all its predecessors this camera still remains one of our
favorites. We have basically punished this cam to the limit and it just
stays out there and delivers. We are now waiting on the 08 cams to start
a new year.
| |
Trigger time with
out flash (2 seconds)
  |
| |
Trigger time with flash
(3 seconds)
  |
|
|
| Flash Tests |
  |
| Sample Pictures |
Low resolution
      |
| High Resolution |
        
|
| Movie |
 |
|
|

Moultrie
MFH-CCP Power Panel
http://www.moultriefeeders.com

Here is a photo of the bracket Bill modified to provide better
stabilization when bungee'ing the panel to a tree:
   |
Moultrie MFH-CCP power panel review 03-15-2008
Panel Purchased from
TrailCamPro.Com
On many occasions lately I find things that are
advertised on line and once we find a good source we order this item to
review. We attempted to get this item from Moultrie but the request went
unanswered. We then chose another vendor and made the order. The Item
arrived yesterday and out of the box I was extremely disappointed. I had
believed this item to be much larger because of how it had been displayed in
the advertisements. On the other hand the smaller size would be much more
concealable when placed in the woods for an extended period of time. The
larger panels generally have much more efficiency, so we will be taking a
close look at this while we do a long term review. The attached cord is 10
feet long and should allow for the most efficient placement when deployed.
Of the 50 to 60 cams that we have ran off solar panels the past few years we
can say that it is important that when deciding the location to mount the
panel a few things must be considered. The first is the reason to use the
panel is to extend battery life which means that in most cases the camera
will be left alone for extended periods of time. The cam is fairly easy to
conceal but the panel usually sticks out like a sore thumb. To select an
area to mount the cam and to conceal the panel, overhead placement is best.
Most folks will walk under things and not look up. The next thing is to have
a clear shot toward the sun so it cannot be under the canopy of the trees or
a big limb. It is also important to aim at the morning sun. This allows for
the battery to recover more quickly during the quiet period which is late
morning to lunch time. If aimed to the afternoon sun the efficiency of the
panel will be affected. The panel at $ 90 is just about impossible to secure
unless we figure a way to cover the knobs that hold the panel orientation.
So this being the case proper placement can be important for those who use
their equipment in areas where other folks may visit and decide they want to
take it home with them without your permission. We had some good luck also
selecting a very large tree and placing the panel on the ground behind the
tree out of site. Many times the overhead locations actually move’s the
panel closer to the canopy and will be less effective. If the base of the
tree has a more open area toward the morning sun, this might be a better
location provided it is secure.
We have a very distant area in a swamp that we monitor on occasion and this
will be our long term test area for this device. One of my old I 60’s will
be the test cam. I have a couple of concealment ideas that I might try to
kinda dull the reflective frame on the panel. If this was several months ago
I would have probably recommended that you just buy extra SLA high AHr
batteries for much less than the cost of the panel. Now that lead has gone
so high on the market the cost SLA batteries have through the roof and the
panel makes more sense. We will also use the panel on other cams to see how
well it works with other than Moultrie cams.
The next thing is the included instructions (operating instructions) which
is just one large sheet of paper with printing on both sides. To put it
bluntly there is very little intelligent instructions here. You are on your
own with this thing. There is no mention of battery type that needs to be
installed inside the camera or the start up procedure to insure that the
camera is not damaged by the hookup. The web site is also a joke when
looking for instructions for this device. We will just have to take it slow
and work our way through this and try to write some amount on proper
procedure so everyone using this $90 accessory can get a benefit from the
purchase without wiping out a $300 camera.
The
panel frame is 6 inches square and the actual solar panel face is a
tiny 4 ½ X 5 inch rectangle.
|
There
is a small sealed battery compartment on the rear of the panel that
is about 1 ½ X 4 ½ inches that holds a small rechargeable battery.
|
The U bracket for mounting is attached to each side of the panel with thumb
knobs that when tightened close the bracket to the camera with small
indentations on the bracket and camera to prevent slipping. The suggested
method of mounting this bracket to the tree is with lag bolts. In our area
here in Georgia the practice of putting anything into a tree on most hunting
leases would be looked upon as a big problem. So now we must also come up
with a sensible method of mounting this device without causing damage to the
trees. The panel with internal battery is a chunk of weight so the average
bungee cord would not work. There is no means of charging the panel’s
internal battery at home inside. They suggest to taking it outside and leave
it in the sun for 8 hours to bring the voltage level up to a usable level
prior to taking it to the field. Right now a 12 volt Harbor freight panel
and a UPS 12 volt external battery look real good. I can charge that sucker
on my kitchen table. We own our testing property and we still do not wish to
damage the trees by using the lag bolt method. My thoughts are to add
something to the U bracket to accommodate a small ratchet strap like the
ones used by buckeye. This method works well even with the larger and
heavier panels. One other thing that might bother folks is the bright white
sticker on the back of the panel that might give the cams location if not
covered up when deployed. All of this initial poking around with this panel
and then having to figure out some small modifications to fit our particular
situation brings up a big question. Is
it worth the trouble? Our I and M series Moultrie’s have a
battery life using Energizer D cells of about 2+ months on an active area
taking lots of pictures. If the cam uses 6 D cells and lasts 2 months then a
years worth of batteries would be the cost of 36 batteries which is less
than $30 a year. This means I could run my camera 3 years for the price of
one panel. And when you use the panel you still have to have batteries
inside the camera. Will my M or I series last 3 years and will the industry
come out with new cams by that time that will make our present day cams look
like junk? We do not know those answers but logic says “probably”. Now when
catering to the purest hunters that have the need not to disturb the area
for a longer period of time these panels would probably be a good idea
providing you have a large enough card in the camera to hold all the
pictures taken during that extended period. We will still do the long range
review on this product but as of now I would think that most folks would
just stick with the good old alkaline cells.
I took the glossy black U bracket that came with the panel and modified it
with a small plate so I could use a ratchet strap and replaced the plastic
knobs with ¼ X 20 eye bolts to accommodate a cable or chain to provide a
method to lock the panel to the tree.
I
chose to mount the panel upside down to show that the strap could handle the
extra weight. The normal mount would allow better aiming toward the sun. I
also used a small amount of Bow (archery) tape to the reflective edge of the
panel to aid in concealment. The front of the panel will have to remain
shiny but in most cases will be pointed up toward the sun and will only
reflect to a small area like a mirror. Another couple of hours to get this
thing woods worthy so we can proceed with the review.
 Bracket
with panel mounted upside down to better illustrate a higher degree of
stress yet strap handles weight
with no problem. Proper installation
would be the other way so panel could be aimed more correctly toward the sun.
03019-2008 update: I have my Stealth cam WD-2 IR which has been
pulling long term security testing hooked to the panel without any internal
batteries. The cam displays 100% battery after I put the panel through its 8
hour warm up. For you folks that are pretty flush and want some battery back
up for the old I-450 this could be a possible answer. There is probably
limited need to run the Moultrie I and M series cams off this panel because
of their already good battery life. It makes sense to maybe to consider
using this panel on other 12v cams that have the appropriate external
battery port with matching polarity. My WD-2 IR normally will run two months
with just my external battery. The picture count weekly is around 200 on the
3 count burst mode. Should I take one of those Harbor Freight small 12v
panels and paralleled the battery the cam might also last a very long time.
The Camera is located very close so monitoring and card change is easy. If
the situation was where I could not visit the cam weekly then the card would
fill long before the battery ran out. In a security situation this is not
good. In the case where it would be hooked to a Moultrie a 4 gig card could
be used and as long as the rez was set low and picture count was down, the
visit time could be a very long time as long as the panel does what they say
it will do. Time will tell how this works out. Right now my little stealth
cam is sucking the juice out of this little panel.
03-20-2008 update: Over night the WD-2 IR took no pictures yet
brought the battery level down from 100 % to 18 % and being directly in
the morning sun the level has climbed to 28 % by 12 AM and I have 21
morning pictures on the cam. It does not appear to be very effective as
a stand alone battery source to any cam. To be of any value a person
would have to have some type of internal batteries in the cam. The
instructions do not cover what to do with the camera, whether to use
rechargeable or standard batteries. When this device decides it needs to
recharge itself it appears to provide a shunt so that the internal
batteries will take over without interruption. Once the panel has
recharged itself the shunt will open and the cam will again run on the
built in small battery in the panel. There would have to be zero delay
between these switching so the cam would maintain programming.
03-20-2008 afternoon update: A quick check at about 2
in the afternoon the indicator on the side of the panel again is
back to 100%, this is a gain of 82% in 7 hours and the picture count
is up by 6 pictures. So far it has kept the cam going. Should we
have a gray day that recovery might not be possible. I do feel a
little better about this product. That degree of recovery to me is a
surprise. The panel is aimed directly at the sun in the open with no
obstructions not like you would find with the normal forest canopy,
which would be more filtered. Very late afternoon when the sun was
low the reading started to drop towards 90 %.
03-21-2008 update: Early morning reading 80 % and 21
pictures at 10 AM reading was 87 %. This basically
proves this device will sustain a camera
provided there is sun available.
A lot of time has been spent trying to figure
this device out and here is the conclusion. The instructions
that came with the panel are inadequate. The Moultrie web site
information on this panel as of now is basically non existent.
This is what we have found out:
| Out of the box charge the
unit by placing it in 8 hours of sunlight not
connected to the cam. Install regular alkaline
batteries in your camera. Leave the switches off
both on the panel and cam. Plug the cable from the
panel into the camera. Turn the panel on then the
camera. Place the panel facing as much sun that is
available. This orientation should be towards the
morning sun if your busy period (when most pictures
are taken) is mostly in the evening, night and early
morning. If your busy period is mid day then the
afternoon sun would be a better choice. Using a
bungee on the panel will probably not work unless it
is very heavy and strong. Using a regular strap or
ratchet strap will work fine with a small
modification to the U bracket. The panel will work
on other cams and will provide stand alone power as
long as there are good sunny days. If there is
clouds or weather in the area for more than one day
the panel would run out of power and the cam would
shut down if it does not have internal batteries
installed. This device will provide power until an
extended period (2 days) of limited sun occurs then
the panel voltage level will cause the panel to shut
down to recharge and when this happens it shunts the
external outlet so that the internal batteries will
take over and run the cam. Once the panel has been
exposed to enough sun again it will automatically
remove the shunt and the camera will again begin to
run off the panel. |
One of our I 60’s is going to get the job of getting a new 4 gig
card and a set of alkaline batteries along with the panel and
off to the bottom of the swamp property for a good long term
test. I still think that $90 would buy a lot of batteries.
03-28-2008 update: I spent a
lot of time researching different adapters that will convert
from one plug size to another so we now can just about adapt
this panel to most any cam. The Moultrie I and M series
cameras are pretty large and more difficult to conceal. We
are presently testing cameras that have about the same
features and performance and are the size of your fist. This
puts these cams in a much better light as far as concealment
and they come with a degree of security. I then use an
extension cable like the one built for the Leaf River IR-X
and remote the panel to a concealable position. This would
make for an ideal setup in security situations. It is a
shame that the SG-550 is 6 volts because it would be my
first choice for this type of setup.
03-28-2008 update #2: It
appears that we have ruffled some feathers in the
Moultrie establishment. They feel that their panel
should only be used to support Moultrie cams. They are
pretty unhappy that we found that the panel will also
support a number of their competitor’s cameras. They
noted that many of their future cams will be designed to
go ahead and use this panel. We have no Idea of just how
long the battery pack that is sealed in this device will
last but my gut feeling is less than three years of
continuous use. I base this on the amount of
rechargeable batteries we use and every one has a
predicted life and that is in the number of charges that
it will go through prior to failing. The old nicad cells
were bad and the NIMH also have limitations. Then we now
have some cams that are using the LI technology which
many of these new devices have failed already (one of my
shop drills) which caused me to replace the battery. SLA
type of cells could also be used but their life is
shorter than the LI technology. This sealed unit does
not have a means of just changing out the cells. It will
require a trip to someone’s customer service department
provided it is still under warranty. A scan of the box
and the sheet that the device came with makes no mention
of any warranty. If it is like normal, you will be on
your own after one year, provided that there is any
warranty at all. I presently have a can full of our
expensive rechargeables of every description that have
failed and now are waiting for that final trip to the
recycling facility. The test will go on and we will also
continue to do parallel tests with all compatible
cameras with the external port.
04-01-2008 update: The panel has been
running one of our cams now in the field for over a week
and the mid day reading was 68% and the picture count
had only increased by 23 pictures. The panel is directed
in the open at the morning sun and had a good four hours
of it to obtain that reading. We received a short note
from Moultrie stating that the panel was covered by
their standard warranty and they do not have any of the
replacement batteries in house but at some point in the
future they hope to have them. This would require a trip
back to the repair center provided it is still covered
by warranty to have the panel broken down and new cells
inserted and re sealed. Though it is not written any
place we assume that that warranty period is one year.
04-04-2008 update:
The communications with the Moultrie folks has again
opened up and we are receiving information
concerning their products. The warranty information
on their web site is found under their frequently
asked question area which is a strange place. This
is the link:
http://www.moultriefeeders.com/FAQ/MoultrieWarrantyFAQs.htm#productwarranty
They state that the period is one year provided that
some requirements are met. They also stated that
they are not unhappy that their panel works with
other cams but have no data on that type of
application so they do not condone that practice
because of possible damage to those cams. We intend
to provide that data. Should they eventually receive
the necessary repair parts for that panel and they
state when an item is returned to them and it is
repaired it will again have a one year warranty.
04-05-2008 update:
The panel so far has worked with all the
Stealth WD series, I series, and Wildview
cameras. We are waiting on a new Spypoint to
arrive and we feel that it also would function
with this panel. The 08 Bushnell cams will have
the external battery port but we have not seen
them yet but they are due in here in May. The
Recon cams will also have external battery ports
judging from the early information that we were
able to sneak out. All the HCO cams have ports
but they are a different size and we are waiting
on the cables to arrive. Once the cables get
here I feel they will also be on the list.
04-09-2008 update:
Another week and at first glance the level
reflected 87% but the cam had only taken one
picture during the week. We decided to move the
cam to another area where we had good sun and
have a more active animal presence.
04-12-2008 update: The new location
pushed the picture count up to 40 pictures this
week and the panel maintained a 72% reading. We
have had a couple of gray days and this
afternoon there is some rain which would account
for the lower reading.
04-19-2008 update: Picture count
(25) was down this week but the panel maintained
a 85% reading.
05-03-2008 update: Picture count
last two weeks (123) and panel dropped to 65%.
05-10-2008 update: Picture count
(143) panel dropped to 58%.
05-17-2008 update: Picture count
(103) panel up to 60 %
05-31-2008 update: Picture count (185) panel back up to
79% (2 week)
06-15-2008 update: Picture count (100) panel at
78% (2 week)
06-29-2008 update: Picture count (320) panel reading 82
% (2 weeks)
07-05-2008 update: Looked at the panel this morning and
the reading was 85% and even though the picture count this week was
low we are going to say that this device in conjunction to the I and
M series cams that we have tested it with works and works well. This
will be the last weekly report and we will continue the test and if
we have a change in function we will then report it. Without the
panel we would probably have only used about $12 worth of batteries
to this point. The convenience of not having to always packing that
sack full of batteries when you head to the field would be nice.
|
|